Like
many great scientific advances, classical conditioning was discovered
accidentally.
During
the 1890s Russian physiologist Ivan
Pavlov was looking at salivation in dogs in response to being fed, when
he noticed that his dogs would begin to salivate whenever he entered the room,
even when he was not bringing them food. At first this was something of a
nuisance (not to mention messy!).
Pavlov
started from the idea that there are some things that a dog does not need to
learn. For example, dogs don’t learn to salivate whenever they see food.
This reflex is ‘hard wired’ into the dog. In behaviorist terms,
it is an unconditioned response (i.e. a stimulus-response connection that
required no learning). In behaviorist terms, we write:
Unconditioned Stimulus
(Food)
> Unconditioned Response (Salivate)
Pavlov
showed the existence of the unconditioned response by presenting a dog with a
bowl of food and the measuring its salivary secretions (see image below).
However,
when Pavlov discovered that any object or event which the dogs learnt to associate with food (such as the lab
assistant) would trigger the same response, he realized that he had made an
important scientific discovery, and he devoted the rest of his career to
studying this type of learning.
Pavlov
knew that somehow, the dogs in his lab had learned to associate food with his
lab assistant. This must have been learned, because at one point the dogs did
not do it, and there came a point where they started, so their behavior had
changed. A change in behavior of this type must be the result of
learning.
In
behaviorist terms, the lab assistant was originally a neutral stimulus. It is
called neutral because it produces no response. What had happened was that the
neutral stimulus (the lab assistant) had become associated with an
unconditioned stimulus (food):
In
his experiment, Pavlov used a bell as his neutral stimulus. Whenever he gave food to his dogs, he also rang
a bell. After a number of repeats of this procedure, he tried the bell on its
own. As you might expect, the bell on its own now caused an increase in
salivation.
So
the dog had learned an association
between the bell and the food and a new behavior had been learnt.
Because this response was learned (or conditioned), it is called a conditioned
response. The neutral stimulus has become a conditioned stimulus:
Pavlov and his studies of classical
conditioning have become famous since his early work between 1890-1930.
Classical conditioning is "classical" in that it is the first
systematic study of basic laws of learning / conditioning.
To
summarize, classical
conditioning (later developed by John Watson) involves learning to associate an unconditioned stimulus that already brings about a particular
response (i.e. a reflex) with a new (conditioned) stimulus, so that the new
stimulus brings about the same response.
Pavlov
developed some rather unfriendly technical terms to describe this
process. The unconditioned
stimulus (or UCS) is the object or event that originally produces the
reflexive / natural response.
The
response to this is called the unconditioned
response (or UCR). The neutral stimulus (NS) is a new stimulus
that does not produce a response.
Once
the neutral stimulus has become associated with the unconditioned stimulus, it
becomes a conditioned stimulus
(CS). The conditioned response (CR)
is the response to the conditioned stimulus.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We love your comments